Plot: The philosophical writings of the Confucian follower Mencius, largely dealing with the need for rulers to act with benevolence.
My copy was the Penguin classic translated by D. C. Lau (ISBN 0140442286)
My thoughts: Much like Confucius’ Analects, these writings are largely analogies based on the actions of rulers and men which time outside China has now forgotten. There is some interest in the time of these writings, as the Empire was going through the Warring States period, and Mencius seems to have been a wandering philosopher and wise man visiting the various courts.
I tried very hard to stay interested, but I’m afraid Chinese philosophy is not for me, any more than Greek. So what I can share with you?
“From biased words, I can see wherein the speaker is blind; from immoderate words, wherein he is ensnared; from heretical words, wherein he has strayed from the right path; from evasive words, wherein he is at his wits’ end.” Book II, part A.
“Mencius said to King Hsuan of Ch’i, ‘Suppose a subject of Your Majesty’s, having entrusted his wife and children to the care of a friend, were to go on a trip to Ch’u, only to find on his return, that his friend has allowed his wife and children to suffer cold and hunger, then what should he do about it?”
“Break with his friend”
“if the Marshall of the Guards was unable to keep his guards in order, then what should be done about it?”
“Remove him from office”
“If the whole Realm within the four borders was ill-governed, then what should be done about it?”
The King turned to his attendants and changed the subject. Book I, Part B.
Personal rating: 3
The sanity in between: Doctor Sleep, Stephen King’s sequel to his much better work, The Shining. Entertaining but not brilliant.
One last try with Chinese philosophy, the Inner Chapters of Chuang Tzu (sometimes written as Zhuangzi) Nope, a few pages in and I know when I’m beaten. Its back to the Greeks and the Idylls of Theocritus.